Wiktionary talk:Frequency lists/Korean 200
What is the source for this frequency list? All of the other frequency lists have at least a semblance of reliability. 18.104.22.168 00:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Not a clue, but it seems to have been derived from some sort of automated wordlist generator run over a fairly small corpus of conversational Korean. If you're looking for something with more of a semblance of reliability, please try Wiktionary:Basic Korean Vocabulary List. -- Visviva 02:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
For such a small list, the appendix has too many non-lemma forms, some would not pass CFI, e.g. word + particle (다음에). @Wyang, TAKASUGI Shinji Is it worth keeping? I'm not eager to fix it. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)