Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility"

Purpose

Is the purpose of this best spun as "to legitimize the de facto unvoted-on imposition of inflexibility by the design and implementation of templates"? DCDuring TALK 16:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

My opinion is: For undecided and undiscussed matters, we can basically do whatever we want. For example, if we begin working on a language for which we did not create any entries yet or creating new templates ({{inh}}, {{bor}}) we could do whatever we wanted.

But if we place something on EL or CFI, especially by vote, that should be able to be discussed, but inflexible otherwise. That's why we have votes, isn't it? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Therefore, I do think EL and CFI should be inflexible on the terms above, some of those are unvoted and that annoys me to some extent, but for the voted-on rules I'm okay with considering them inflexible. (unless otherwise discussed and revisited) I'm saying this because you mentioned "de facto unvoted-on". --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)