User talk:Ilovemydoodle

We do not use {{delete}} for entries unless they are clearly non-existent, spam, vandalism, mistakes (by editors), etc. — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 09:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Isn’t “Jewkraine” obviously spam? Ilovemydoodle (talk) 09:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

How so? — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 10:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

It sounds like a made word used for vandalism. Ilovemydoodle (talk) 10:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Well, it has 3 cites so it meets CFI, right? Just because a term is derogatory, offensive, etc. doesn't mean it's spam or vandalism. Acolyte of Ice (talk) 10:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Got it. Ilovemydoodle (talk) 10:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Bidenism

Why on earth would you delete all the useful content like citations? Equinox ◑ 14:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

I already fixed it. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 15:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism

@Equinox How were my edits “absolutely egregious vandalism”? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Please explain, I am genuinely confused. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 15:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleting senses just because you disagree with them is vandalism. — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 15:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

@Surjection I don’t "disagree", the ones I kept are far more common. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

@Surjection Also, how am I a "a known troublemaker at Wikipedia"? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Unblock

@Equinox Could I have an unblock discussion? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 15:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

No. But you can wait a week, it's only a week block. Please try to behave a bit more sane after that. Nobody wants to baby-sit you. Equinox ◑ 08:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I still don't understand how I vandalized. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 14:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Block

@Surjection I was mass-reverting an IP address range that mostly consisted of LTAs and vandals, but also had a few legitimate users. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:24, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

@Surjection Could you unblock as this was a false block? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

No. It's clear you are simply incapable of contributing constructively - every time after your block expired you just found a new way of being disruptive. This one will not. — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 07:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Unblock

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ilovemydoodle (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • user creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

Block was falsely made, as I was mass-reverting edits by a (shared) IP range (whose edits are mostly from vandals and LTAs, but contain some legitimate contributions) and was not intentionally vandalizing pages. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)