Talk:beadle

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Surjection in topic RFV discussion: October 2023
Jump to navigation Jump to search

capital letter[edit]

The word has a capital letter in the quotation from Woolf. Sarcasm, or grammatically justified?zigzig20s 17:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Possible missing senses[edit]

Chambers 1908 has "a mace-bearer (esp. of the 'bedels' or 'bedells,' official attendants of the Oxford and Cambridge vice-chancellors); a petty officer of a church, college, parish, etc.; (obsolete) a messenger or crier of a court". Equinox 08:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: October 2023[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


RFV of Etymology 2 with four new senses relating to speech. @S ḳʷnṭHls Ioaxxere (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The usexes look like weird Anglish to me. And how come "northern England" was changed to "Cockney" in the same sequence of edits? Equinox 16:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Looks like a systematic fake. No hits for the German, Dutch (save unrelated sense), Scots etc. @Leasnam And the IP who created the alleged Proto-Germanic entry is what, a proxy? Fay Freak (talk) 17:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Can RFV's for German bäudeln, Dutch boedelen, and proto-Germanic *baudilōną be bundled in with this, or should we create separate RFV's for them in their normal locations? Soap 20:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I created Etymology 1 only, which at the time was only "Etymology". I have not seen the other till just now. Leasnam (talk) 23:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Leasnam: Well sure sign the creator tried to make fools of us, if you have not seen such a thing even in front of your inner eye. See the non-English RFVs. Insinuates a deletion spree. Fay Freak (talk) 23:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Speedied as a hoax. The user and IP are both blocked. — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 10:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply