User:Biolongvistul
| Wiktionary:Babel | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
| Search user languages or scripts | |||||||||
Anyone would agree that Wiktionary’s killer feature (as far as non-English languages are concerned) is its etymologies. Meanwhile, many entries are written with the definitions as a second thought.
Fine points about a word’s natural use and positioning fall outside the focus of even the best monolingual dictionaries, are too granular and numerous for grammar books to keep track of, and may well not be the concern of learners’ dictionaries outside the biggest of the world’s languages. Wiktionary’s usage notes are able to fill this niche that is as of now only served by decade-old threads on word reference forums. To this end, the free-form text of usage notes should be more robustly, prominently and unambiguously integrated with individual definitions. I propose a wider implementation of the footnote system in use at de#Romanian.
I would be happy to receive digitalised Hebrew lexicographical resources.
User:Biolongvistul/Romanian sources
Only boring user pages have entry lists on them. Entries to add: