Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/supnós
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Gnosandes
@Victar, Friendly. Why should the form look like Proto-Indo-European *supnós, and not Proto-Indo-European *súpnos? ---- Gnosandes (talk) 02:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Because it's a zero-grade. --
{{victar|talk}}
02:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC)- Aha, but that accent contradicts all the data. Removing the accent from Balto-Slavic is more like speculation. ---- Gnosandes (talk) 02:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Victar, What you wrote is very unconvincing. You treat the reconstructed language as your own conlang (artificially created for the benefit of someone). ---- Gnosandes (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oh yes, me and my fake sources. 👏 --
{{victar|talk}}
03:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)- @Victar, Divination on coffee grounds. Чепуха detached from reality. :D ---- Gnosandes (talk) 04:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oh yes, me and my fake sources. 👏 --
- @Victar, What you wrote is very unconvincing. You treat the reconstructed language as your own conlang (artificially created for the benefit of someone). ---- Gnosandes (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Aha, but that accent contradicts all the data. Removing the accent from Balto-Slavic is more like speculation. ---- Gnosandes (talk) 02:31, 22 February 2020 (UTC)