Talk:Kirindy Mitea

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Imetsia in topic RFD discussion: May–June 2021
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: May–June 2021

[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Not dictionary material. Imetsia (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why not? Seems to be a place name, not a company or brand or anything. Equinox 02:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
We shouldn't have an entry for every national park, government building, public statue, bus stop, street corner, etc. Users can look to maps, not a dictionary, for that information. This is not even an especially popular national park and fails our new CFI for place names (at least by my reading). Imetsia (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Keep. It fulfils CFI for place names, I'm sure other national parks are included. DonnanZ (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Under which heading — "geological landforms and regions?" I don't interpret that category so broadly as to include national parks, but other editors might see it differently. It seems somewhat unnatural for a national park to be called a "geological region," especially when its limits are not decided by geological features (e.g. and cf. elevation for hills and mountains, landscape/sandiness for deserts, fault lines for tectonic plates, etc.). Imetsia (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
I would call national parks geographical regions, which are much larger than a street corner. Other entries including national parks include Yellowstone, Lake District, Fiordland and more than likely others. National Park also qualifies for an entry, funnily enough. DonnanZ (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Good point. Keep. It's harmless. DAVilla 15:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
RFD-kept. Imetsia (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply