Talk:PWA
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: Promethean Workers Association - seems to be a very obscure club. --Vealhurl (talk) 12:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 21:58, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense "Pagan Webcrafters' Association", looks trollish/irrelevant. – Jberkel 12:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I see that it's the name of a webring popular in the mid-1990s, in the very early days of the Web. I would say that they no longer exist, in any reasonable sense. A quick google search suggests that they once held the domain name thepwa.net, but the site at that address today is spam and almost certainly not run by the founders of the Pagan Webcrafters' Association. If the organization itself no longer exists, does that mean the sense can be removed, or do we still go through the same process of finding three citations in the interest of preserving history? —Soap— 15:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I just wanted to add one more thing .... despite being at the bottom of the list today, it seems this has been on the list since the very beginning, back in 2007, and so I would say that it is a holdover from the days when the webring was still active. I had assumed at first that it was a recent addition to the list. —Soap— 15:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
RFV failed –Jberkel 17:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)