Talk:ocker
notalsoCAPitulizd?
[edit]iuseit4ALozppl,aditionaly..81.11.233.26 00:56, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- May be capped or not; see given citations. I will create the capped entry. Equinox ◑ 00:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/TK_archive_icon.svg/55px-TK_archive_icon.svg.png)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
rfd-sense pertaining to an ocker. All the citations just look to me like attributive-noun use Br00pVain (talk) 13:45, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- If the quotes are genuine, the comparative "more ocker" occurs in three of them. On that basis, the adjective should remain. DonnanZ (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- The case for adjectivity is quite borderline, since gradation with "more"/"most is not 100% conclusive ("that's the most New York thing", "that's the most Angela Merkel attitude", etc), and a lot of the citations look like attributive nouns, as Br00p says. I did find and add one citation of "ockerest". - -sche (discuss) 20:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- A more common adjective might be ockerish. But I'm a Kiwi, not an Aussie. DonnanZ (talk) 20:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep - As an Australian, ocker is definitely adjectival. One cite uses "ockerest", which albeit jocular is still clearly adj. Another cite has "more ocker than". Also, Lemming can be invoked: Macquarie Dict., Australian National Dict., Oxford Concise, etc. Have added 2 more cites (1984, 2005) where it is clearly adjectival. Also changed the def. - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 12:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Sonofcawdrey. The def now reads "(slang, Australia) Uncultivated; boorish.", probably changed by Sonofcawdrey as per above. “ocker”, in OneLook Dictionary Search.:oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com has a similar def. The entry has quote containing "with the ockerest of ocker humour", where ockerest is adjectival and the quotes containing "more ocker" are also adjectival. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- RFD-kept: no consensus for deletion. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)