Talk:divisio

Reversion of my edit.

I know it's the Latin page. And "Divisio" is the latin rendering of the relevant rank within the taxa, as stipulated by the International Association of Plant Taxonomy, as you can find at

https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/pages/main/art_3.html?zoom_highlight=divisio

To put it another way, I wasn't looking for the English page. And reverting it is one thing, but waving a flag about "harmful edit" in my face is another. Wayne aus (talk) 14:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

The "harmful edit" is probably a filter that you managed to hit somehow (possibly by adding a link, but I'm not sure), and I don't see your edit as "harmful". The main reason I reverted it is because I didn't see what it adds, since "division" is already listed. It also seems it would at the very least be New Latin, but I wouldn't be 100% opposed to a simple "{{lb|la|New Latin|botany}} division" ("Contemporary Latin" would be better but doesn't seem to be a valid label). — surjection ⟨?⟩ 15:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)