Talk:CN Tower
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Prince Kassad in topic CN Tower
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Not dictionary material. Delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.—msh210℠ (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Well, keep. If I understood correctly, CN Tower only needs a pronunciation section now to be eligible, per WT:CFI#Place names. Presumably, Eiffel Tower would fall into the same criteria, and it also has only a sense, an image, some translations and a link to Wikipedia. --Daniel. 16:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I think "CN Tower" does not qualify as a place name, since it is no place. -- Prince Kassad 16:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- If it qualifies as a place name, then it arguably fails under the rule "names of streets and other minor landmarks needed to create addresses, such as Madison Street or Elm Avenue are not included if they can be recognized as street names or the like from their wording". But I'm not convinced it qualifies as a place name.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this qualifies as just a "specific entity" without further rules, and this is a pretty major entity, like Empire State Building. --Yair rand (talk) 22:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Yair rand. DAVilla 07:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
kept. -- Prince Kassad 10:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)