Talk:Mew

RFV discussion: July 2011–February 2012

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Mew

What? -- Liliana • 04:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

This should probably have been listed in rfd, as it can obviously verified for existence being a species in Pokémon. It won't satisfy CFI, coming only from one anime universe. Jamesjiao → ^{T ◊ C} 05:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

But RFV is reasonable since as a commercial toy it needs to meet WT:BRAND. Equinox ◑ 18:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 06:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)