Talk:O1

RFD discussion: May 2020–January 2022

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

O1, O−1, O-1

Relationship status in Hong Kong Cantonese. If they are allowed to be kept, every OX (where X is an integer) entry can be created. RcAlex36 (talk) 09:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

@RcAlex36: Where would you suggest such things to be documented? At O? Not every OX can be created because not all of them would be attestable. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 09:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

@Justinrleung: In the Cantonese section of O? RcAlex36 (talk) 11:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Keep, I doubt there can be enough of these to be disruptive.__Gamren (talk) 13:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

RFD-no consensus. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 19:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)