Talk:QAnonsense
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
POV entry, but although that is salvageable there are few durable uses. This is probably durable, but even this probably isn't. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 17:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- cited Kiwima (talk) 02:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Kiwima Nice job, so it passes as a hot word. The Hollywood Gossip, a "celebrity gossip blog", does not seem durable durable, though.
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Kiwima Nice job, so it passes as a hot word. The Hollywood Gossip, a "celebrity gossip blog", does not seem durable durable, though.
RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 20:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Tagged by User:Chuck Entz in April for "serious POV problems". At that time the definition was, "The conspiracy theories and other nonsense promoted by followers of QAnon." I've rewritten it as, "Conspiracy theories or other statements by followers of QAnon that are asserted to be nonsense." This seems relatively unbiased to me, but it is not all that different from the original. Cnilep (talk) 00:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Chuck Entz: Does the entry look acceptable now? or do you have other suggestions or concerns? Cnilep (talk) 22:53, 16 August 2021 (UTC)