Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-tis

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This Proto-Indo-European entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Indo-European

[edit]

    Suffix

    [edit]

    *(é)-tis f

    1. Derives abstract/action nouns from verb roots.

    Reconstruction notes

    [edit]

    Whether this suffix had a proterokinetic inflection has been contested.[1] Descendants predominantly have a zero-grade root; those with full-grade root (often with final laryngeal) show a distribution similar to verbal adjectives in *-tós.[2] The varying accentuation of Vedic abstract nouns on -ति (-ti) can be explained as a chronological evolution within Sanskrit, with the original accent mostly on the suffix.[3] To account for the ablaut in the suffix (*-ti- vs. *-tey-), an explanation based on syllable structure has been proposed:[4] when the following ending (originally) started with a consonant, the suffix has zero grade in Indo-Iranian, otherwise full grade.[5] The genitive singular is then explained by the ending *-s coming from earlier *-es/*-os.

    Inflection

    [edit]

    Proterokinetic pattern:[6]

    Athematic, proterokinetic
    singular
    nominative *(é)-tis
    genitive *(Ø)-téys
    singular dual plural
    nominative *(é)-tis *(é)-tih₁(e) *(é)-teyes
    vocative *(é)-ti *(é)-tih₁(e) *(é)-teyes
    accusative *(é)-tim *(é)-tih₁(e) *(é)-tims
    genitive *(Ø)-téys *? *(Ø)-téyoHom
    ablative *(Ø)-téys *? *(Ø)-tímos
    dative *(Ø)-téyey *? *(Ø)-tímos
    locative *(Ø)-téy, *(Ø)-tḗy *? *(Ø)-tísu
    instrumental *(Ø)-tíh₁ *? *(Ø)-tímis

    Hysterokinetic pattern, possibly preceded by the proterokinetic pattern:[1]

    Athematic, hysterokinetic
    singular
    nominative *(Ø)-tís
    genitive *(Ø)-téys
    singular dual plural
    nominative *(Ø)-tís *(Ø)-tíh₁(e) *(Ø)-téyes
    vocative *(Ø)-tí *(Ø)-tíh₁(e) *(Ø)-téyes
    accusative *(Ø)-tím *(Ø)-tíh₁(e) *(Ø)-tíms
    genitive *(Ø)-téys *? *(Ø)-téyoHom
    ablative *(Ø)-téys *? *(Ø)-téymos
    dative *(Ø)-téyey *? *(Ø)-téymos
    locative *(Ø)-téy, *(Ø)-tḗy *? *(Ø)-téysu
    instrumental *(Ø)-téyh₁ *? *(Ø)-téymis

    Derived terms

    [edit]
    • *-ti-
      • Proto-Celtic: *-tiyū
      • Italic:
        • Latin: -tiō (see there for further descendants)

    Descendants

    [edit]
    • Proto-Balto-Slavic: *-tis
      • Latvian: -tis
      • Lithuanian: -tis
      • Proto-Slavic: *-tь (see there for further descendants)
    • Proto-Balto-Slavic: *-tei (< locative -téy)
      • Latvian: -t
      • Lithuanian: -ti
      • Proto-Slavic: *-ti
    • Proto-Celtic: *-tis
    • Proto-Germanic: *-þiz (also the variant forms *-diz, *-tiz, *-siz) (see there for further descendants)
    • Proto-Hellenic: *-tis
    • Proto-Indo-Iranian: *-tiš
    • Proto-Italic: *-tis

    References

    [edit]
    1. 1.0 1.1 Lundquist, Jesse, Yates, Anthony D. (2017–2018) “Chapter XX: Proto-Indo-European”, in Klein, Jared S., Joseph, Brian D., Fritz, Matthias, editors, Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics: An International Handbook (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science]; 41.2), Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, →ISBN, § The morphology of Proto-Indo-European, page 2127:the action/process-noun forming suffix *-ti/tey- regularly attracts the surface accent when suffixed to these roots, i.e. PIE *mn̥-tí- ‘thinking; thought’, *bʰr̥-tí- ‘bearing’
    2. ^ Vine, Brent. 2004. "On PIE full grades in some zero-grade contexts: *-tí-, *-tó-" in Indo-European Word Formation, Proceedings of the Conference held at the University of Copenhagen, October 20th – 22nd 2000, pages 357–379
    3. ^ Lundquist, J. (2015), "On the accentuation of Vedic-ti-abstracts: Evidence for accentual change" in: Indo-European Linguistics, 3(1), pages 42-72.
    4. ^ Kiparsky, P. (2010), Compositional vs. paradigmatic approaches to accent and ablaut, pages 15-17
    5. ^ Kümmel, M. (2014). "Zum “proterokinetischen” Ablaut" in: Das Nomen im Indogogermanischen: Morphologie, Substantiv, versus Adjektiv, Kollektivum, pages 167-169: "Iir. i/u-Stämme, urspr. Endungsanlaut mit Konsonant korreliert mit S(z)"
    6. ^ Ringe, Donald (2006) From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A Linguistic History of English; 1)‎[1], Oxford: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 48