Talk:πŒ²πŒ°πŒ±πŒ°πŒΏπ‚πŒΈπŒΉπ…πŒ°πŒΏπ‚πŒ³

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Mnemosientje
Jump to navigation Jump to search

@Holodwig21 Are you sure there are Germanic cognates of this that would justify positing a Proto-Germanic ancestor? It looks like a straightforward calque of γΡνΡαλογία (genealogΓ­a) to me (this is what KΓΆbler also claims). β€” Mnemosientje (t Β· c) 16:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Mnemosientje: Well I don't have cognates that would explained the word, but the existence of an "i" in gabaurΓΎiwaurd when the Gothic form, πŒ²πŒ°πŒ±πŒ°πŒΏπ‚πŒΈπƒ (gabaurΓΎs), doesnΒ΄t carry an "i" alludes me to the possibility of it coming from Proto-Germanic. πŒ·πŒ»πŒΏπŒ³πŒ°π…πŒΉπŒ²πƒ πŒ°πŒ»πŒ°π‚πŒ΄πŒΉπŒΊπŒΉπŒ²πŒ²πƒ 16:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Holodwig21: This is easily explained by the fact that πŒ²πŒ°πŒ±πŒ°πŒΏπ‚πŒΈπƒ (gabaurΓΎs) is an i-stem: the thematic vowel (in this case an i) is hidden in the nominative singular, but in compounds it very often does manifest. This is regular in Gothic compounds, you see it with the "hidden" -a- in a-stem nouns too when they are used to form compounds (see Category:Gothic compound words) β€” Mnemosientje (t Β· c) 16:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Mnemosientje: if that the case then the Proto-Germanic reconstruction can be deleted, I’ll take care of it right now thank you for the clarification. πŒ·πŒ»πŒΏπŒ³πŒ°π…πŒΉπŒ²πƒ πŒ°πŒ»πŒ°π‚πŒ΄πŒΉπŒΊπŒΉπŒ²πŒ²πƒ 17:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply