This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.
¶ Are any of the citations unacceptable? --Pilcrow 20:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
See Citations:et ceteræ. I think it's awfully fair-spirited of you to nominate your own entry for rfv even after providing 9 citations, but to be honest I'd rather you didn't. If nobody disputes the entry, assume it's valid. IMO rfv-passed (before it was even listed). --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
¶ This topic has not received many responses, so I am goïng to mark this as closed. --Pilcrow 19:37, 22 June 2011 (UTC)--Pilcrow 03:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)