This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Nothing relevant in Google Books. The referenced papers are not all publicly accessible due to paywalls, and one that was accessible didn't seem to contain this two-word term at all. One of the links is to the creator's own site, which smells of spam. Is it just a sum-of-parts "awareness of interruptions"? Equinox◑ 18:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes, this just seems to be an SoP term which has not risen to the usage level of a set phrase. · 18:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be on PubMed. Considering the dearth of cites and the link to the creator's own site, I think we can delete this in under a month.—msh210℠ (talk) 22:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Since none of the public references used the term, I've now deleted it as spam. Equinox◑ 21:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I checked all of the references, the only one to use the term was the creator's personal website. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:14, 5 September 2011 (UTC)