Talk:juglandaceous

Um, this has 'entry that should be deleted' written all over it. --but then I searched Google and see it referenced. Maybe the etymology and/or meaning is the only thing wrong. -- Then I found it in the OED (listed as 'rare botany'), fixed page.

Finished fixing page (formatting was wrong, definition given is not primary). Taking the description as "a word sorely lacking" at face value and adding an etymology for a word clearly derived by normal grammar was, of course, a mistake. Mea culpa. -dmh 15:15, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)