This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The 1963 and 2011 citations look good, the other two look useless. Do three citations exist for any of these senses? Ƿidsiþ 15:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
AFAICT, this term has been coined on multiple occasions, always as a humorous / nonce word. Each sense has only one supporting quotation. The 1996 quot. is a mention, but the other three are uses, though I agree that the 2007 quot. is of negligible value. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 22:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Passes, but the defs could not be sustained by a single citation each, so I merged them into something broader. Ƿidsiþ 08:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)