Talk:trong
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Seems like a product name or neologism. I highly doubt this is a genericized name. Cannot find any references in literature. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 19:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- I couldn't find anything either. There's a Chinese Wikipedia article with the title 髒剋. DTLHS (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- An English Wikipedia article seems to never have existed, I'd assume it would get shot down at AFD if it existed. How the Chinese entry has persisted for so long is a little surprising, maybe they were more of a hit over there? SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 20:15, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- Did you check the links of the Chinese Wikipedia article? --Hekaheka (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- All of them are either from the company that makes them or someone reselling them. Any other use is in uppercase (and even some on the site itself!) SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 21:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Did you check the links of the Chinese Wikipedia article? --Hekaheka (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- An English Wikipedia article seems to never have existed, I'd assume it would get shot down at AFD if it existed. How the Chinese entry has persisted for so long is a little surprising, maybe they were more of a hit over there? SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 20:15, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 02:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)