Talk:were-

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Although "were-" originally meant "man", I think its current use in English is a re-analysis of werewolf, and now has the shape-changer meaning. Is there an example of a non-lycanthrope usage? --Vladisdead 03:38, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

RFV discussion: May–June 2021[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense "man". The derivation category only contains types of shapeshifters. Is it ever used in the general sense of "man"? Some of the translations seem to be for just "man".__Gamren (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

werewolf = lit. man-wolf, man that transforms into wolf
similar are: weredog, werecat, werepanther, wereleopard, werelion, werelioness, wereanimal - with "human form" in the definition (in some other entires it's only "shapeshifter who can assume the form of [animal]), but all overlap with shapeshifter. — This unsigned comment was added by 2003:DE:3728:BF14:A5B6:4709:CF0F:FF1F (talk) at 01:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

RFV-failed. Although it once meant man, as can be seen in terms like weregild, in modern English, it is only a productive prefix for lycanthropes. Kiwima (talk) 22:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]