Template talk:rfv-passed
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Andrew massyn in topic links
Wanted: better icon[edit]
I think this should have a better icon...maybe filing it into a file cabinet, or something? --Connel MacKenzie T C 06:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
links[edit]
This template really should link to the section of the appropriate archive, right? Is the reason it does not currently, only technical? I think an earlier iteration of this template very nicely included the actual discussion (cut-n-pasted) from RFV. That method might be better, after all. --Connel MacKenzie T C 18:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. Such discussions should go along with this template on the talk page, with the archive leaving links to these terms and/or their talk pages. — Vildricianus 18:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- If it can be done it would be great! Otherwise, I can just put the discussion on the talk page manually. Please let me know if it can be done. Andrew massyn 18:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Also, Wiktionary:Survived verification process isn't really necessary I guess. — Vildricianus 18:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- True. When we created the template, we wern't sure whether it needed a category page to go with it or not. I would be happy if it were deleted, but am not confident enough to delete it myself. :) Andrew massyn 18:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)