Re: Cite policy

We do not only document contemporary usage. We document all usage of English that is attestable from WT:CFI-acceptable sources, including ancient and obsolete words and words that "Geofferybard" doesn't like. Why the hell won't you read the policies before stamping in with your naive ideas?

Dude I made ONE mistake a hundred edits ago. Also, are you suggesting then that "respell" is no longer contemporary usage? Yeah of course archaic usage is included,and would be tagged as such. Why are you flying off the handle over that? What about the many terms which were not in here such as the Tibetan words and the Calvinist terminology? The Federal acronyms? Yeah, it is best to review the policies and procedures but on the other hand it would take a week to review every policy and procedure and by then all of that groovy Zen Mind Beginner's Mind enthusiasm is lost. You obviously seem to think that the inconvenience of performing that revert outweighs the contributions. You are entitled to your opinion.

Why don't you review WP:BITE? Yeesh.Geof Bard 01:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

I won't review "WP:BITE" because this is Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. If you haven't worked out the difference yet, please do so before you continue editing.

I think the pertinent adage is "Don't make the perfect the enemy of the good."

Ever considered doing your own research instead of just arguing about it?