User talk:173.190.198.44

Pelorism

The fact that you made a Facebook page does not make this a word. Read WT:CFI please. Equinox ◑ 21:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

The fact that the Facebook page (That I wasn't the one to create) addresses the movement's followers and not the word itself, and the fact that the word was defined in a book means it is. 173.190.198.44 21:20, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

No need to ask you if you read WT:CFI, then! Mglovesfun (talk) 21:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Yup, no need, because it's obvious that I did and that this term is valid. — This comment was unsigned.

In the same way it's 'obvious' that I'm thirteen feet tall. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Apparently editing a talk page is a responsibility you're not ready for. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

On my blog, you posted

Are you asking to get Wiktionary sued on your behalf? Do you not realize that this is a legitimate movement and the term Pelorism has credible sources? You cannot seriously deny that it is a real word. Other dictionaries have added it, yet you refuse to let Wiktionary join them in the ranks. Then you go around and flaunt it as "created gibberish" and that it was "quite funny, though"? You've reduced our beliefs to mere mockery and jokes, somehow having the gull to say I was making any of it up? To add to all this, you say I'm not responsible enough to handle editing MY OWN talk page, when you aren't even giving me a valid reason as to why you unjustly blocked me? You, sir, have earned the title of being the most ignorant man I have ever met. A man of disgrace to humanity and to the freedom of religion.

Rubbish, this has nothing to do with freedom of religion. You're free to believe in whatever you want. But you can't force that on other people. Furthermore WT:CFI#Attestation says "three durably archived citations", three is two more than one. Wiktionary is not your personal playground to advertise whatever you want. Use facebook, blogs, YouTube, whatever, that's not our concern, but this website has clearly defined rules, and you should complain no more about this than you should for being sent to prison for murder. Or is being sent to prison for murder against your religious beliefs, and therefore you think you should be exempt from it? Mglovesfun (talk) 22:16, 4 December 2011 (UTC)