Category talk:Esperanto 1894 Universala Vortaro
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic Deletion debate
Deletion debate
[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
In that case, I nominate the category. It would be like having a category for all the words in the first edition of Merriam-Webster -- pointless. The Esperanto Official Basic Roots (BRO) does at least take the place of Category:1000 English basic words nicely.
- Added the category to the title of this header. Razorflame 17:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- No keep. This is different as its a constructed language, and we're talking about the first official dictionary. It seems dictionary-worth and specific to me, I can see several reasons to keep it. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we can move the contents of the category to an appendix? Razorflame 20:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- No keep. This is different as its a constructed language, and we're talking about the first official dictionary. It seems dictionary-worth and specific to me, I can see several reasons to keep it. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Any language with an official reference of every word in the language should denote "official" words in some way.--Prosfilaes 15:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Kept, I also suspect that Razorflame nominated this because of his dispute with Opi. Furthermore, he has no support of any kind. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)