Wiktionary:Votes/2013-10/Reconstructions need references: difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "=== {{subst:SUBPAGENAME}} === * Voting on: whether Appendix pages on reconstructed protoforms (e.g., {{recons|h₂ŕ̥tḱos|lang=ine-pro}}) should only be allowed if they ha..." |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 23:41, 18 October 2013
Reconstructions need references
- Voting on: whether Appendix pages on reconstructed protoforms (e.g., Template:recons) should only be allowed if they have references to sources (scholarly work) that either give the exact form, or then provide evidence that supports that form (e.g., sound changes that would create it). Pages that remain unreferenced after a certain amount of time was given for references to be added should be deleted.
- Vote starts: 00:01, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
This vote has not yet started. It has been created to solicit advice on wording and fitness to purpose. Feedback and new ideas are highly encouraged! If you have not done so, please follow the discussion links for a better understanding of the topic. However, do not vote for any options at this time, as any premature votes may be struck. On the other hand, if the discussion is stagnant and there are no recent changes, anyone may choose to start this vote by properly listing it. Once the starting date has arrived, this banner may be ignored or removed.
- Vote created: Pereru (talk) 23:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Discussion:
- WT:BP#
- [[User talk:#]]
- Wiktionary talk:Votes/2013-10/Reconstructions need references