User talk:Fish bowl
Minor update to 350bot
[edit]Hi - if you haven't done it already, could you please update 350bot to use "hanzi" instead of "Han character" when adding Chinese entries? I noticed quite recent additions like π«², so I assume you'll be doing it again in the future. Thanks. Theknightwho (talk) 16:20, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
γγγγγγ
[edit]Do you have attestations for any of the terms you added here? I removed the ones where γγγγγγ was not given as a pronunciation or where there was simply no Japanese term (as opposed to Chinese term) given. Either add the Japanese meanings or remove them from γγγγγγ. TE(Γ¦)A,ea. (talk) 19:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- They are derived from listings in major Japanese monolingual dictionaries: https://www.weblio.jp/content/γγγγγγ
- Although the lack of a
{{rfdef}}
on the existing entry is poor formatting, and the lack of full entries is unfortunate, I oppose simply removing them instead of continuing to list them in{{ja-see}}
(cf. [1]); they are clearly obscure terms of lesser importance, not hoaxes. βFish bowl (talk) 20:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Why is this page still in that category?
[edit]When I was creating the page "εΊι³ε³δΎ", I copied the page style of the page "ε€ι ηη€" for reference. After I had copied that, I forgot to delete the last row of the code whose outcome was to include the page to the category "Mandarin terms derived through romanized wordplay". Today I found the page "εΊι³ε³δΎ" appeared in the category "Mandarin terms derived through romanized wordplay" and I went to delete the last row of the code to remove the page from that category. But the page, whose title is the simplified form, "εΊι³ε³ζ₯", has not been removed from that category. How to remove this page from that category? --NasalCavityRespiratory (talk) 14:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- It might take a while for the change to propagate naturally, but if you want to remove it immediately, you can open the edit page for εΊι³ε³ζ₯ and click "save" without changing anything to force the server to refresh. βFish bowl (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
What does pronoun missing part of speech mean exactly?
[edit]You added some of the pages I created to the category but I don't know what that means or why so many entries (especially single character entries) are in there Dengzeren08 (talk) 17:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Dengzeren08 Template:zh-pron is the pronunciation (not pronoun) template, and it categorizes words into "Chinese lemmas", "Chinese nouns", "Cantonese lemmas", "Cantonese nouns", "Wu lemmas", "Wu nouns", etc. because that's where the Cantonese/Wu/etc. information (
|c= |w=
) is given. The single character entries are in there because no one cares enough to give/verify a definition and determine the correct part-of-speech. βFish bowl (talk) 22:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)