Category talk:Languages with automatic transliteration

@Erutuon: Thanks for this! Unfortunately it only captures languages with their very own translit module; when a module is a named for the script it transliterates (Module:Linb-translit), the languages using that script aren't included.

But strangely, it does include Armenian, even though the module isn't Module:hy-translit but Module:Armn-translit. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 09:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Per utramque cavernam: Actually, it captures all languages with the translit_module field in their data table. It doesn't matter what the name of the module is. Maybe the languages that are missing will show up over the next day or two as the pages update. — Eru·tuon 20:24, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Erutuon: Indeed, my bad. I can see that Mycenaean is already there, by the way. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Erutuon, Per utramque cavernam: The category probably needs to be further split by whether the manual translit overrides the automated. Also, Thai (and now Khmer) rely on entry's transliteration, which should override the automated but manual but manual overrides the automated - there are THREE methods for these two languages. Burmese should or could probably do the same. @Wyang: What say you? --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 01:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)