Talk:вейка

@Atitarev There seems to be some disagreement as to whether this noun is feminine or neuter. Can you help? Benwing2 (talk) 05:39, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

@Benwing2: "ве́йкаў" seems quite common as well and is attestable. On this link I can only see a snippet of "акон — вокнаў, валакон - валокнаў, веек — вейкаў, гумен — гумнаў, вёдзер — вёдраў" but it's a proof that these alternative forms are considered literary. The author quotes from different authors. I wouldn't define any of these as Taraškievica only. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 06:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

BTW, yes, it's a neuter. I have no idea why "ве́йкаў" is not included in the declension in slounik. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 06:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

In the Google books hits I saw, "ве́йкаў" is also commonly inlcuded in non-Taraškievica writings. E.g. Беласнежка (not Беласьнежка), блiсне, сляпак, etc. are non-Taraškievica forms. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 06:34, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

@Benwing2: Wow, you started to use the inflection module, can we include "ве́йкаў"? --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 06:42, 26 July 2020 (UTC)