Talk:ႂ

RFD discussion: July–August 2023

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

ႂ

Shan.

Keep I think this was marked for deletion because the Unicode name is too succinct. I've bulked up the name - this character is exactly what the Unicode character says it is - unless the Unicode proposal is fraudulent. It, or some iteration of it, gives examples, as do we - Shan ၵႂၢႆး (kwáai)! --RichardW57m (talk) 16:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

It's not a matter of Unicode being too succinct, but that (a) Unicode is not a reliable source for anything but Unicode, and (b) we should provide our own definition anyway. For many of these articles, someone blindly copied the Unicode definition without verifying that it's legit. BTW, as far as I'm concerned, once someone has created an actual entry with some content, the deletion tag can be deleted. kwami (talk) 21:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

RFD tag removed This, that and the other (talk) 00:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)