Talk:

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dokurrat in topic RFV discussion: November 2017–January 2018
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: November 2017–January 2018

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Japanese section. Dokurrat (talk) 20:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Might merit deletion. Weblio is the only online aggregator that I can find that lists it, and that's only the KANJIDIC data, which has (I think?) been established to be untrustworthy for our purposes. Kotobank doesn't have it, nor does Jim Breen's WWWJDIC, nor does my dead-tree Shogakukan.
google books:"壸は" (adding in the particle (wa) to filter for Japanese) ostensibly gets 285 hits, collapsing to 128 when paging through the results. Sadly, almost all of these only offer "snippet view", and this only shows what Google thinks the text is -- rendering "snippet view" much less useful for confirming scannos. The first hit did provide preview, which showed that Google was mistaking for . I suspect the others are all scannos as well. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 03:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply