Talk:미끄럽다

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Etymology[edit]

This appears to be a compound: perhaps some variant of (mil, water) + possessive infix -s- + 그렇— (geureot-, “to be like that”) + —ㅂ— (-b-, adjectival suffix)? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 01:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting theory. This is what the inbuilt Korean dictionary of Mac says:

〔√믯[滑]+글(접사)+업(접사)-다. ➙믯그럽다(百聯 20) / 믯그러워(杜詩初 25:41)>믯글업다(譯語補 5)>미끄럽다〕

This is related to 미꾸라지 (mikkuraji, “loach”), which has the following passage:

〔√믯[滑]+글(접사)+아지(접사). ➙밋그라지(物名 2:4)>미꾸라지〕

Regarding (muys, *slippery), Seo Jeongbeom's Korean Etymological Dictionary says:

‘믯’의 말음 ㅅ은 사잇소리다. 그렇게 본다면 ‘구리’는 ‘굴+이’로 분석되며 명사다. ‘믜’는 믇>믈>믈이>므이>믜의 변화로서, 물(水)의 뜻을 지닌다.

also proposing a relationship with (mul, “water”). Wyang (talk) 03:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aha, so the root is not directly (mil, water) + possessive infix -s- outright, but at least a root of (muys, *slippery), derived from (mil, water).
For the latter portion, (geul) as just an "affix" seems quite vague. There's the clear example shown in 그립다 (geuripda) with adjectivizing infix -b-, and a lack of clarity in the Mac dictionary. Are there other qualitative verbs that end in 그럽다? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 06:57, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
seems to be an ideophone (擬態語) suffix. There are a lot of adjectives ending in 그럽다:
A lot of adjectives ending in 끄럽다 can be traced to (s) + —글— (-geul-) + —업— (-eop-) + —다 (-da):
I suspect 둥글다 (dunggeulda, “round”) may contain this as well. Wyang (talk) 07:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Two thoughts arise for me, after reading this.
  1. Is this also the root of 그렇— (geureot-, “to be like that”)? If so, is this essentially (geu) + (l) as a suffix?
  2. Is it correct to analyze 그럽다 as 그렇— (geureot-, “to be like that”) + —ㅂ— (-b-, adjectival suffix)?
TIA, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 20:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Really interesting possibility; the origin of —글— (-geul-) seems obscure, but a relationship with (geu) is possible. 그럽다 would be analysed as (geul) (which can be either part of the root or an affix) + —업— (-eop-, adjectival suffix). I had a look in the Middle Korean reference books I have and could not find any reference to the root-forming element —글— (-geul-). It seems to me that —글— (-geul-) could be a long-obsolete ideophone suffix, which gave rise to Middle Korean 擬態語 roots 징글 (jinggeul), 믯글 (muitgeul), 너글 (neogeul) (< 넓— (neol-)), 시끌 (sikkeul), to which —업— (-eop-, adjectival suffix) was added to produce the modern —그럽다 words. Some evidence for the ideophonic nature of these roots is in the expressive adjectives:
It would be part of the ideophone allofam of *-kuC-, where the "elements" —근— (-geun-), —금— (-geum-) and —긋— (-geut-) also belong. For example:
And the common *ku in the allofam may be related to (geu).
P.S. Seo considers the kur(i) in 미꾸라지 (mikkuraji, “loach”) and its ancestor 믯구리 (muitguri) to be related to 개구리 (gaeguri, “frog”) and 머구리 (meoguri, “frog”). I'm not very convinced. Wyang (talk) 04:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]