Talk:Pokemons
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The correct plural is Pokemon (or the official spelling, Pokémon), no? Teh Rote 21:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Incorrect, but still quite common. Weak keep as a mis-spelling or non-standard spelling.--Dmol 21:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- From what I gather, Pokemons is a tongue-in-cheek "Engrish" way of referring to Pokemon. Not sure whether or not that merits inclusion, though.--TBC 21:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Dmol. Circeus 23:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I might say delete since from my experience (I am a fan after all) this is just an example of "being stupid to be funny" which is comparable to what is done in the following extract from a Will and Grace (the sitcom) script
WILL: [TO GRACE] Hi. [TO PUPPY, PUPPY-TALK VOICE] May I bite your snoots? May I bite your snoots from loves?
GRACE: Please stop pluralizing everything.
WILL: But he's so cutes!
GRACE: Look at mes. I can't believe you are still playing with the puppy. You've been home for 3 hours, and you haven't moved. --50 Xylophone Players talk 20:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- 300 googlebooks. RJFJR 21:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Kept. Clearly attestable plural. --Jackofclubs 18:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Pokemons is not the correct plural. The correct plural is simply Pokemon. To say Pokemons is a plural form is just wrong. If you keep this entry you have to note that the form is not the correct form, but only used as tongue-in-cheek.