Talk:afore-explained
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Almostonurmind in topic RFD discussion: July–September 2022
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
And afore-enumerated. Probably SOP Dunderdool (talk) 09:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, SOP in the same way that previously-mentioned and above-stated are. - TheDaveRoss 16:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep if attested. Ƿidsiþ 10:15, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Attestation doesn't factor in to SOP terms; it is easy enough to find use for very fast car but that doesn't make it a lexical unit. If you are saying it isn't SOP that is another story. - TheDaveRoss 12:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I say that only because I've never encountered this. But if it passes RFV, it should pass RFD since I would consider it a single word (so SOP doesn't really apply). Ƿidsiþ 15:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Attestation doesn't factor in to SOP terms; it is easy enough to find use for very fast car but that doesn't make it a lexical unit. If you are saying it isn't SOP that is another story. - TheDaveRoss 12:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
*Delete, SOP and obvious. Highly unlikely to be looked up in a dictionary. Facts707 (talk) 10:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep aforeexplained per WT:COALMINE as per new info below (thanks). Can't seem to find aforeenumerated though. Facts707 (talk) 13:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Facts707: Cited the one-word variant aforeenumerated. 98.170.164.88 18:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Maybe COALMINE applies? [1], [2], [3], [4]. It's not that far-fetched, cf. aforementioned, aforesaid, aforedescribed, and so forth. 98.170.164.88 20:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Created aforeexplained with citations. 98.170.164.88 18:31, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per WT:COALMINE. Binarystep (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Kept per all Almostonurmind (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC)