Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
Rfv-sense: Common misspelling of artful. How common is it? Mglovesfun (talk) 15:06, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
B.g.c. gives 1,420,000 results for "artful" but only 174 for "artfull", making artfull <1.23‱ as common as artful, or about two hundred times rarer than the most inclusive of minimum proportional thresholds (~2–3%). Moreover, besides the fact that it is too rare for inclusion as any kind of common misspelling, listing artfullboth as a legitimate obsolete spelling and as a misspelling is redundant. So, for reasons of clocking-out, rarity, and redundancy, I declare this RFV failed. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)