Talk:common law
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFV discussion: March–June 2014
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Two senses seem problematic. One appears to be defining "common law system" and the other "common law jurisdiction". Should these senses really appear under common law on its own? Equinox ◑ 16:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed: the senses define "common law system" and "common law jurisdiction" rather than "common law". --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- RFV failed: no attesting quotations provided. And the defs did not even make sense as defining "common law" rather than "common law system" and "common law jurisdiction". --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)