Talk:have a word with
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Tooironic in topic have a word with someone
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
have a word with[edit]
I think these are SOP. We should add have a word and delete these two. Let's have a word about it! --Hekaheka 09:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC) Added "have a word". --Hekaheka 09:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Could redirect IMO, but yes having three separate entries is bad. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have checked before I added have a word with someone. Yeah, I support keeping have a word and deleting the rest. ---> Tooironic 13:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Could you do the Chinese translation? It's now from "have a word with someone". --Hekaheka 13:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- No worries. Done. ---> Tooironic 14:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Could you do the Chinese translation? It's now from "have a word with someone". --Hekaheka 13:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have checked before I added have a word with someone. Yeah, I support keeping have a word and deleting the rest. ---> Tooironic 13:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- I'm gonna go ahead and delete those two entries. One of them was my fault anyway. I can't see any valid reason why we should keep them, but I will maintain redirects. ---> Tooironic 08:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)