Talk:infotactic

RFV discussion

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

Equinox ◑ 20:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

This term appeared in the Nature article that introduced the concept. "Appearance in a refereed academic journal" supersedes all other attestation requirements, so we can basically close this RFV right now. :-P   —Ruakh_TALK 02:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)     P.S. Now cited. —Ruakh_TALK 22:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Not quite. Unless someone writes an entry on infotaxis, "infotactic" is useless. --Hekaheka 07:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Useless, but valid. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

We still use that rule?? DAVilla 13:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Dunno about "we", but I do. It's in WT:CFI. —Ruakh_TALK 18:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

RFV passed. —Ruakh_TALK 18:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)