Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so. See Wiktionary’s criteria for inclusion.
An astounding zero books.google.com hits; wasn't even marked as non-standard. (Probably should check all contribs of User:Rob.) Number one hit on a regular google search gives a link to urbandictionary. I think they should keep it. --Connel MacKenzieTC 07:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Some of the most commen items in leetspeak and internet jargon we should keep, such as LOL or ROFL, but the more obscure ones like these aren't really fit for inclusion here. — Vildricianus 14:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Added Usenet cites back to 2001. "Obscure" ? Pfft. :p —Muke Tever 22:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)