Talk:kaclekadisto
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deletion debate[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This was recently created, but there's nothing to say it actually exists. --SixTwo 22:19, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Everything is hypothetical in a constructed language. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 22:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Did you mean to send this to Wiktionary:Requests for verification? That's where requests for citation, i.e. proving something actually exists, go.--Prosfilaes 23:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Whether it's hypothetical or not is off-topic - is it in use? I know from experience that Google Books and Scholar (probably Groups too) have enough Esperanto for things to be attestable. If there really are no hits at all, anywhere, this should just go. Sometimes you can have three hits on Google and six hits on Google Books, as the Google search engine searches the web, not 'everything'. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- But not in this case. Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Whether it's hypothetical or not is off-topic - is it in use? I know from experience that Google Books and Scholar (probably Groups too) have enough Esperanto for things to be attestable. If there really are no hits at all, anywhere, this should just go. Sometimes you can have three hits on Google and six hits on Google Books, as the Google search engine searches the web, not 'everything'. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC)