Talk:lowpriced

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: March 2018[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


The validity of the quotes needs to be checked. DonnanZ (talk) 13:24, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what the deal is. The new quotations (1916, 1972, 1994) were entered by Lingo Bingo Dingo. What is the problem? --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:36, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This, I'd wager. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 13:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe Donnanz interpreted my vote there as a tit-for-tat? If so, it wasn't, I was simply working my way up after commenting at "low-priced". See here for Dykema and Gibson. I've removed Vance, as it turned out that the Medieval Review is online only. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The three Usenet quotes all look good, as do the 1916 and 1945 quotes. I couldn't find the 1972, but that still leaves enough to meet our criteria. Kiwima (talk) 22:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the Marine Institute Ireland digitised Gibson 1972 with a slightly different handle than in the title, but this can be found through Google when you leave out the initials and from there you can navigate to this. Also note that the spelling low-priced is more common in the 1945 quote. Added another journal quote (Frank 1966). ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 10:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 21:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]