The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process..
Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
Rfv-sense: Tagged earlier in 2010 by Ultimateria, this is the only ever edit by User:Jprulestheworld01 (talk • contribs) - looks bogus to me, either a protologism or a misunderstanding of the primary meaning. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- See Talk:feminism. That one ended up failing RFV because antifeminists are too incoherent, but antimulticulturalists — despite often being the same physical people as antifeminists — seem to be a bit better.) —RuakhTALK 14:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC) . As with many movements, its proponents and opponents often define it differently. It's hard to construct an NPOV definition that captures all range of uses, but it's probably not ideal to create a "POV fork" definition that implies that the proponents and opponents are simply talking about different things. (For a similar previous discussion, see