Talk:parisome

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic Request for verification
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Request for verification[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


French for warbler. Can anyone confirm/deny? Ƿidsiþ 09:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The French Wiktionary has it, and w:fr:Parisome says yes as well, albeit as a redirect to the Latin name. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
google books:"parisome" has several hits, but they're all either:
  • not visible
  • not French (including one scanno)
  • using it, capitalized, as a genus name
and some fall into more than one of these categories.
RuakhTALK 22:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Avibase : the world bird data base has 12 answers in French for "parisome". --Szyx 12:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think I should apologize now. Yes it seems very rare in French, most of the hits are from the French Wikipedia and its mirror sites. Some sort of long-running joke? I'm baffled to be honest. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
No long-running joke here. Confirmed also by Dictionnaire Universel d'Histoire Naturelle de 1847 (1847 universal dictionary of natural history). See the "parinées" entry. — Xavier, 12:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed, entry deleted. I have seen no evidence that parisome is a French noun meaning “warbler”. However, I've now created an entry for Parisome, which is or has been a French proper noun denoting the genus Parisoma. I'm not sure what its gender is, and I'm not sure if it needs a context label; y'all are welcome to have at it. —RuakhTALK 16:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply