Talk:pur sang
Latest comment: 11 years ago by -sche in topic RFV
Wordsmiths[edit]
http://wordsmith.org/words/pur_sang.html claims this is also a noun and adverb. Rich Farmbrough, 18:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC).
RFV[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
As pointed out on the talk page (of this page), this is tagged but not listed. It already has a few citations at this point, but they italicise the term as a borrowing... - -sche (discuss) 23:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- On the other hand, if fr.wikt is to be believed, the French term doesn't have the meaning the English term is claimed to have, so italics don't matter (English can't be borrowing a sense French doesn't have). - -sche (discuss) 18:04, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Kept by that logic; retag the entry if you disagree with that logic. - -sche (discuss) 11:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)