Talk:sensu stricto
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Translingual and Latin section, but the only category is Category:en:Biology! Mglovesfun (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- The category tag was simply missing a language parameter. I've corrected it to {{context|taxonomy|lang=mul}}. --EncycloPetey 18:23, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Is this Translingual? Is this how citations of translingual terms should look? DCDuring (talk) 05:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @DCDuring: I moved the list of abbreviations to synonyms and marked off the non-gloss portion of the definition, not sure what else to do with it. —Nizolan (talk) 23:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Me neither. DCDuring (talk) 23:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Putting this here since there's a recent discussion about the word. I have never seen this sense: "Added after a taxon to mean the taxon is being used in the sense of the original author". In my experience it only means in a less inclusive sense when there is a more inclusive sense to contrast with. The original author may have meant either or neither sense. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:50, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
RFC-resolved in diff. --Fytcha (talk) 18:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)