Why remove the cognates? Somebody obviously put a lot of work into them and this is where I put mine since the topic was discussed at the Beer Parlour a couple of weeks ago. — Hippietrail 12:35, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I removed them, as their pages can be added to the Indo-European root category. If you feel they should be listed under Etymology as well, they can be returned. (Most of them don't have entries yet, anyway). --Vladisdead 12:43, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
In the See also part of the page, there is a word which reads chionodoxa. Its link is broken. It isn't linking to the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chionodoxa Instead you get a red link. Is wikipedia broken? Or am I missing something?