Talk:surrogatum

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic Request for verification
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RfV sense in Canadian law[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Law? Canada? Taxes? Ety? DCDuring TALK 02:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Now rfv-sense. DCDuring TALK 11:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
There is now an entry at surrogatum principle. Does "surrogatum" mean "surrogatum principle"? Are there quotes of someone writing, say, "under surrogatum, this would be treated as a dividend" ?

[Note: the below comments have been merged from a separate section.]

There is already a section for discussing this entry above. Please place all comments there. --EncycloPetey 18:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC) no longer relevant. --EncycloPetey 23:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Clocked out. DCDuring TALK 10:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
But see Wiktionary:Requests_for_verification#surrogatum_principle below. DCDuring TALK 11:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Clocked out without comment for 15 months. DCDuring TALK 19:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


Request for verification[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Law? Canada? Taxes? Ety? DCDuring TALK 02:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Now rfv-sense. DCDuring TALK 11:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
There is now an entry at surrogatum principle. Does "surrogatum" mean "surrogatum principle"? Are there quotes of someone writing, say, "under surrogatum, this would be treated as a dividend" ?

[Note: the below comments have been merged from a separate section.]

There is already a section for discussing this entry above. Please place all comments there. --EncycloPetey 18:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC) no longer relevant. --EncycloPetey 23:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Clocked out. DCDuring TALK 10:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
But see Wiktionary:Requests_for_verification#surrogatum_principle below. DCDuring TALK 11:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Clocked out without comment for 15 months. DCDuring TALK 19:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed, sense removed by EncycloPetey. —RuakhTALK 22:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply