Template talk:en-con
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Yair rand in topic Template:en-conj
Move debate[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Last I checked, con was for conjunctions, cont was for contractions, and conj was for conjugations, at least that's how it is for other languages. Shouldn't this template, which is used for English conjunctions, be moved to {{en-con}}? --Yair rand 19:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- How about
{{en-conjunction}}, the least ambiguous possibility. That would simply swap the redirect and the template. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)- Hm, a quick search of "conjunction" in the template namespace shows the templates to be quite divided. We have
{{eo-con}},{{nl-con}},{{arc-conj}},{{cmn-conj}},{{lo-conj}},{{nan-conj}},{{hy-conjunc}},{{ka-conjunc}},{{xcl-conjunc}},{{sh-conjunction}}, and{{ur-conjunction}}. Apparently there is no pattern at all. --Yair rand 20:42, 13 April 2010 (UTC) - Like
{{math}}and{{maths}}redirecting to{{mathematics}}, rename but keep the redirect, for all of them. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, a quick search of "conjunction" in the template namespace shows the templates to be quite divided. We have
- Moved. --Yair rand (talk) 20:46, 28 June 2010 (UTC)