User talk:Crete98926

Dear Mr. Entz, I can appreciate your long list of credentials, but blocking this new word in the language with a legitimate definition, used by thousands now due to my facebook creation page, makes no sense. This is not an advertisement. Its simply a word created by me, and I want that noted. I want a clear explanation how you are defining the word "oilamony" as spam.

The word itself isn't spam. It's conceivable that it could be admissible if it was found to be in use, as established according to the standards in the Criteria for inclusion. The part that's advertising is the prominent inclusion of your name in the definition, which reads like an excuse to include it, and as a promotion of your business. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)